Sunday, November 10, 2013

Peter Knight interview

Here is the recording of the whole interview I did with Peter Knight on Vault today:


Here is the transcript:

CB: Thanks so much for giving up your time to talk to me.
PK: No worries.
CB: It's fantastic for the girls to be able to understand a bit more about your music, and if we could get a couple more insights from you that would be wonderful.
PK: Sure, a pleasure.
CB: I've just got some sort of general questions about your approach and about your background, musically speaking, and some quite specific questions about the piece we've looked at, which is “Vault” from Cities and Signs.

PK: Mmhmm.
CB: Firstly, I had a read of the whole novel of Italo Calvino - it's a fascinating book - and I could see some of the connections with some of the other movements, like “Hypatia” and “Cities and Desire”, but with “Vault”, I was just wondering where the title came from - cause I couldn't see any references to vaults in it.
PK: It's kind of a bit of an oblique reference, it's actually - there's a sculpture in Melbourne called Vault which...
CB: A-ha. I was wondering that.


PK: yeah, it's now kind of located just near VCA where I was studying when I was writing that piece, and it just seemed to connect to - somehow, I kind of made that connection in my mind, and it seemed to also relate to my reading of the Calvino text, but look - the connections that I make with literary references in my work, it's always a pretty - it's more about just a source of inspiration...
CB: A starting point.
PK:.... rather than trying to make it a representation, or some kind of programmatic thing.
CB: That would be boring.
PK: Yeah.
CB: Yeah, cool. Well I can really see that in the opening chords of Vault - the stark, angular, monumental fanfare at the beginning.
PK: Yeah...
CB: And I actually stumbled across a picture of that sculpture, out of the blue, not connected to all of this, and I wondered if there was a connection there, so there you go.
PK: Yeah - well that's well picked.
CB: (laughs) yeah, well that's quite a coincidence. Anyway - fantastic - so - within the whole work Cities and Signs, I'm just wondering why “Vault” was the only one that was published, and not the other ones, or are the other ones on their way out - in sheet music form I mean.
PK: Ah - hmm. I don't know. So is “Vault” the only one that's on the AMC site?
CB: That's right.
PK: That's probably just an oversight. They should all be up. Yeah, there's no rhyme or reason to that really. It's probably about me editing the scores and getting them on there (laughs).
CB: Well this one also seems to have the most actual dots in it, compared to the other ones - I guess a lot of the other ones would have been a bit freer in scoring to allow for more improvisation than this one?
PK: Yeah well the opening piece is “Cities and Desire”, and that’s pretty detailed scoring actually.

CB: All those… breathing and whispering [bits] and all that, they’re all planned out?

PK: Yep. They’re all scored. There’s not much improvisation in that. There’s some sort of aleatoric kind of content, but not much improvisation.

CB: How do you go about doing that aleatoric sort of stuff – do you do things randomly, or just kind of intuitively?


PK: I kind of have pretty specific sorts of instructions for the use of specific textures that belong to players – I knid of wrote a bit about that in my doctorate in relation to Fish Boast of Fishing [score sample here] – there’s stuff in there, you know, little notations that I come up with for specific players – things that they do. And so I can put those notations in there with a little instruction like “quiet” or “dense” or “sparse” or whatever – so it’s a pretty specific sort of sound – but it’s up to the player how they actually execute it.

CB: Right, so it’s very interesting looking at Fish Boast of Fishing – getting away from Vault for a sec – the amount of detail that’s actually in there – and do you do that to sort of get away from players’ intuitive… things that they would do if you just told them “play”? I mean, do you feel like you have to distance people from their impulses, in a John Cage sort of way?

PK: Well, um… I don’t know if it’s about distancing them from their impulses, it’s more about channelling them. Yeah, and it’s also… I suppose Cage was trying to separate the… performer and the idea, or the artwork, […] whereas in jazz the improviser, the artist is always central to the performance as well, and the transmission of the art, and that’s something that Cage found a bit problematic, along with others.

CB: Yeah, he never really got into jazz.

PK: But I mean, I don’t think that’s what I’m trying to achieve, I think that it’s more about just trying to use people’s idiosyncratic improvising language as a compositional element. So there are certain things that I know that Vanessa Tomlinson [percussionist] for instance likes to do – and if I say, “you know that thing with the bowls, can you do a bit of that here?” you know, and find a way to try to notate that, then she does her bowl thing, and I’ve got a sense of how that might work in terms of a larger compositional framework. Whereas with improvising you’re kind of thinking more in the moment, as a composer you step back a little bit and try to guide some sort of larger structures.

CB: Yep, yep sure.

PK: So that’s what it is, so it’s kind of a bit of both, in a way. Yeah. So John Zorn did that a lot of that too.

CB: Yeah, yeah, sure. So, I can see a lot of that in Vault – there’s definitely some structural things being worked out in the musical material. There seems to be a couple of almost conflicting ideas in it that sort of get juxtaposed against each other and then rub up against each other and compete, and then work themselves out. The modal sort of idea – [sings]


and all that sort of stuff which is all white notes, and then you’ve got the [sings]

that sort of really angular –

PK: chromatic…

CB: idea – is that […] symbolic of something, or is it just […] what came out?

PK: No, not really symbolic at all. It’s…[…] what I kind of started with with “Vault” was this idea of moving a voicing around – so that, you know, at the beginning you’ve got that voicing in the fourths…

CB: The “So What” chord?

PK: Yeah. And so it’s moving that…

CB: Like open guitar strings?

PK: Yeah – yeah exactly.

CB: There’s a third in there as well, isn’t there.

PK: Probably…

CB: The two trumpets are in thirds at the top then it’s all fourths underneath, it’s like the open guitar strings.

PK: Yeah right. Well that’s good that you’ve picked that out.

CB: Yeah.

PK: But whatever voicing it is, I guess I just started with this kind of sound, and then moved that around in parallel, and I kind of liked that, and that sort of reminded me a bit of the sort of planes of the sculpture that seemed to relate to … the Calvino sort of sense. And I suppose with the Calvino, you know, what I was really aiming for, was music of great contrasts. You know, like those short stories, you go from one to the other, and you really, you have this kind of – each one has a really different sort of feeling and sense about it. So I was kind of aiming to try to… try to tap into that a little bit, but, um…

CB: Yeah – I can see that.

PK:  I started off with those voicings, and then, I mean… I just kind of really go from there and try and find things that sound good. It’s a very intuitive process, really.

CB: Working out the… did you workshop it with the band to see how it sounded with instruments, or do you just work it out on Sibelius, or…how do you go about doing it?

PK: I do, I do workshop with the band, and so, I mean, most often what I do is I start off with a very bare-bones idea, and then I play that with people and hear what it sounds like, and then kind of go from there. And then go back and refine, and work, and develop. I think with Vault, I mean I started off with that initial kind of idea the kind of opening, I think maybe we played it at a rehearsal and then I write the rest of it from there. And I mean it’s kind of essentially – it’s kind of a jazz tune, it’s got, you know, a bit of a melody and then a solo over an ostinato and then…

CB: Yeah, head – solo – head.

PK: Yeah, it’s a fairly conventional sort of form.

CB: But there’s a lot of very unconventional atonal sort of bits…

PK: Yeah, yeah that’s right yeah.

CB: …which go beyond what you would hear in most jazz.

PK: Yep.





CB: And I can see that you’re using motifs in a way that… that’s sometimes very hidden under the surface?

PK: Yep.

CB: Like that [sings]
 reappears in the bass later on, and it’s covered over, hidden and extended in various ways, that was interesting for us to find.

PK: Yeah, and I often do that, like I try and find, you know, ways of reworking the same material. And I do that all through everything I do, really.

CB: Right. So it’s something you can do composing, and not really improvising…

PK: Well I think as an improviser I kind of do that too.

CB: Yeah… sure, yeah, actually we can hear that in your solo, what am I saying.

PK: Yeah. But you know, it’s always good if you can kind of… rather than adding another idea to a piece, if you can actually find a way of, you know, reinterpreting…

CB: Making the most out of what you’ve got.

PK: Mmm.

CB: Cool. Well that brings me to your solo. We had a really good look at your solo – I transcribed the whole thing…

PK: My solo in “Vault”?

CB: Yeah. Great solo –

PK: Oh thankyou.

CB: and I really loved the particular sort of scale you used at the beginning there, and on the score it says “solo over E flat major” and there’s no way you’re doing E flat major in there! Do you sort of think about scales – I mean it sounds almost like an Indian scale, and in fact I’ve found an Indian scale that’s kind of similar – it’s a – D flat Lydian diminished – I’ve got a piano over here – hang on, something like this – (plays Db Eb Fb G Ab Bb C Db) – that scale is what you’re using?

PK: Yep. I don’t know…

CB: Would you have had any idea, that that’s what you did?

PK: Mmm – no.

CB: Haha, OK that’s interesting.

PK: I’m just trying to think…. of that solo… I think, probably, um…

CB: [helpfully (?) tries to sing solo in falsetto]

PK: Yeah… I’ll have to have a little listen to it. I’m trying to see if I’ve got a copy of it here.

CB: It just opens with this really calm, beautiful, restrained feeling and then it gradually grows and grows and you move into something more bluesy (sings) a bit after that.

PK: That’s right…

CB: with the change in harmony.

PK: … and we start playing the sevenths.

CB: Yeah, yeah so it started off with the C natural and then it goes to the B.

PK: Yeah when the rest of the band comes in. […] You know… I don’t really think in terms of …. the names of scales or modes, although I do know all that stuff pretty well.

CB: I’m sure you do. But it’s just internalised, so you don’t have to… you don’t have to think about it.

PK: But also I think, when I play – when we recorded that, I kind of worked on an approach to soloing over it quite a lot. I mean I didn’t just – it’s not completely different every time, and it’s got a particular sound, and I think probably what I was doing is when I was you know rehearsing with the band was I was trying to find sounds that seemed to suit the sound of the piece, and when, you know, when I wrote those chromatic harmonies and uh… I don’t really think of it so much in theoretical terms, um, often.

CB: Sure – thinking about pure sound.

PK: I mean, what I tend to do is… I tend to improvise… I kind of call it “fishing” actually, I just sort of… I set up, you know, I set up that bassline –

CB: Yep.

PK: And I’ll play it on the piano, or I’ll play it on the guitar, or program it into Sibelius, and then I will play it, and record myself onto mobile phone, improvising with it, either on the piano or the trumpet, and I’ll just do, like four or five passes of improvising, and record that, and then I just go away and forget about it. And then I come back a day later, and play what I’ve recorded, and try to see if there’s any, or try to hear if there’s any, you know, little nuggets of interesting material. And then I work the composition from those. That’s often the process that I use, cause I’m trying to find a way of … of bringing to bear instinct, and just the physical kind of moment of inspiration when something just kind of takes you, and you’re not thinking too much.

CB: Yeah I can see that in Fish Boast of Fishing, the way that you’re cutting up the improvisations and stuff, it’s a really interesting way of working.

PK: Yeah.

CB: It reminds me strangely enough of – I don’t know if you’ve ever heard any Captain Beefheart, from the late 60s, his approach.

PK: Yeah, I have heard – I mean, I haven’t really studied Captain Beefheart, but I know, yeah, I know what you’re talking about.

CB: He used to just go and bang away on the piano, record it and then chop it up.

PK: Oh did he? I didn’t know that.

CB: Yeah – it was all improvisations, and then – separate things, some on white notes, some on black notes, some in different time signatures, and they’d all get crammed in together in the one piece, and then he’d shout over the top.

PK: Did he – did he physically cut up tape, did he?

CB: Nah, he recorded them, and he gave them to the drummer in the band and said “I want the band to play this, oh, and a bit of this and a bit of this” and they’d have to figure out how it all worked together, so it’s really…

PK: Really?

CB: A bit more ad-hoc than your process, but similar sort of… improvisation being turned into structure.

PK: Yeah.

CB: So it’s an interesting way to go.

PK: Yeah and so sometimes I’ll kind of analyse it in retrospect, so I’ll go “I’m liking this sound, so what’s actually going on here?” and then I’ll realise, “Oh OK – I’m using this kind of scale or this idea”, and so sometimes that’s important for thinking about how to rework that material, and sometimes it’s very conscious, so like with the Fish Boast of Fishing thing I started off with an all-interval chord, you know, so I just thought, OK, well what would that sound like if we had one of those chords, and so [we] found sound, you know, using that as a starting point.

CB: Yeah. Cool.

PK: Yeah, and you know… I think I said in the doctorate, I found a clarinet and started playing the clarinet and recording that and, you know… it’s a pretty laborious process, and actually… allowing my compositional processes to be laborious was actually quite a liberating thing for me. When I was younger, and I was studying at undergraduate, I actually really had the feeling that I couldn’t compose. And I was just convinced that I didn’t have whatever it was that it took to compose, because… I never felt that I had inspiration or ideas just popping into my mind, and they didn’t flow easily when I tried to compose, and so I kind of thought, oh well, I’m just not a composer. And I didn’t actually really write very much at all until I was about 30. And then I got so frustrated, you know, playing in the jazz scene, that I just sort of decided that I actually just need to write some music, somehow I’ve gotta work out a way, and I read an article by Kenny Wheeler when he was taught, and he was talking about how long it takes him to write things, and how laborious it is, and how uninspired he feels, and I actually, it was like a lightbulb moment, it was like, OK! It’s OK to be a real, I don’t know, it’s OK to plod. You know, it’s OK to do it however you need to do it, you’ve just got to find a process that works, and, yeah…

CB: So recording for you is a big part of it?

PK: Recording, improvising, I just....[…] I just do whatever I need to do, really. And often it does involve recording and playing back, and thinking, and … I do kind of crazy things, like I’ll go and walk in the park with my phone and just sing into my phone, or, you know, record stuff and walk around listening to it on my phone and then singing along to it and writing notes and, I mean it’s kind of like, whatever it takes, I just do it, you know.

CB: Yeah. Great.

PK: And I think that’s really important for students too, to … just to know that … you’ve gotta find a process that works for you, and often, that will take a lot of time, and it will be intensely frustrating, and you know, often, you’ll feel like it’s a complete waste of time. But if you’re willing to really stick with it and allow it to be all of those things that you wish it wasn’t (laughs) … then you’ll get somewhere! You really will.

CB: Yeah. You’ve got to make all the mistakes before you work out the right way to do it.

PK: Yeah because we’re all – everybody’s creative process is different, I reckon. You know? I’ve got friends who can just sit down, and write a score straight out of their heads, and straight onto the page, they don’t need to go to an instrument, or anything like that – and I’ve got friends who just sit on the tram and a whole tune will just pop into their heads and it’ll all happen like that, and… I have to say also, sometimes those people with - you know - gifts like that, don’t always produce the most interesting music. You know?

CB: Yeah. Yeah.

PK: Because there is less struggle. You know? And they have a way that works. And it’s reliable and they can do it, so they keep doing it. I can think of – I won’t mention any names – but I can think of some really gifted people, who I know well, and I think, well, actually, the music isn’t that interesting, somehow, in my feeling, so…

CB: Like Haydn vs Beethoven, or something.

PK: Well, you know, it’s not a bad thought, I mean, you know, Beethoven struggled all his life, you know.

CB: Everything he came out with was the product of a lot of hard work.

PK: Mm.

CB: OK, well thanks, that’s some really great advice for our composers, I’ll pass that on. Just before we leave “Vault”, we’ve got one student who’s going to playing that for her piece next year, we’re getting a little ensemble together. What advice would you give her, if she’s going to play the Trumpet 2, what advice would you give her in playing it?

PK: Um… hmm… [long pause] I don’t know! [laughs] I mean, it’s kind of about time, you know, I mean you know, you’ve gotta get the time happening, really. So you’ve got to – everybody’s got to be feeling it rhythmically… in a way that works, and is… you know, that’s groovy. I guess. Cause it could be a bit stiff – if it isn’t grooving it could be a bit stiff.

CB: So you’ve gotta listen.

PK: Yeah, and how’s she doing it? She’s getting a band together?

CB: Yep. We’re just playing it as written on the page. So…

PK: Yeah. So working with the bass and drums a lot and getting that really happening…

CB: Interaction.

PK: And then – don’t play too loud. You know – it doesn’t have to be… it’s the blend that’ll give it the power, not the volume, yeah?

CB: That’s great advice. Thanks a lot. Just in general – just two more questions, if I can keep you a little bit longer – your music seems to have a little bit of interest in place and space, would you say that’s true?

PK: Yep.

CB: Looking at your last release, Allotrope, it’s got those Florence St ones which – I really love that first one by the way –

PK: Oh thanks.

CB: Is that a constant theme in your music?

PK: Yeah I like the idea of finding something that really expresses something about time and place. So… I think it’s a bit of a reaction to working with American jazz forms for so long and going, well, actually, you know, I love this music, but it’s not me. And who am I, and what is it to be an improvising musician in 2013 in Melbourne, having grown up in country Victoria, and listened to rock’n’roll music when I was a kid, and… It’s about specificity of moment and place and context, yeah, for sure.

CB: Great. How do you think your stuff fits into Australian music more broadly, is that a conscious thing for you, or do you think we’ve moved beyond the need for Australian music to have its own identity, or is that a big thing that we need to work towards getting better at?

PK: Yeah, that’s a good question, I mean, it’s a hard thing to work towards, isn’t it?

CB: Yeah, how do you do it – put some didgeridoos in the piece…

PK: Look, I’m really – I think it’s really important that we do find ways of expressing the here and now, and I suppose, you know, with the Australian Art Orchestra too, I mean, that’s been a big thing for me to become a part of that and that’s always been about trying to find some sort of unique modes of expression that say something about being Australian but at the same time, it’s kinda like, if that’s the – if you worry too much about it, it can be kind of paralysing, I think. I think most important is we’ve just gotta get on and make some good music, and try to engage with the things around us that are inspiring, and interesting, and perhaps things around us that are sort of unique, I mean one of the things we have here is this proximity to Asia, and the extraordinary mix of cultures right on our doorstep, I mean – if you engage with those things I think it’s kind of inevitable that something unusual is going to emerge. Yeah?

CB: Yeah, yeah. Well that answers my question really well. Thankyou very much for your time and

PK: No worries. It’s a pleasure.

CB: And I’ll give you a link to the blog we’ve done, we’ve done analysis and discussion of your piece, and I’ll put a transcript of this interview up there as well, so.. thanks so much and good luck with the Australian Art Orchestra and whatever’s coming up for you.

PK: Thanks, I really appreciate your interest, and your thoughtful questions, it’s great.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Mountain Chant


One down, four to go: for the rest of the term we will be studying Ross Edwards' choral work Mountain Chant (2002-3) (especially the second movement, called (funnily enough) "Mountain Chant").

1. Read the background information here on the choice of texts, and the inspiration behind the work. 

Where did the text for the middle movement come from? What is Edwards trying to communicate and evoke in the work?

2. Ross Edwards' musical style is very distinctive and incorporates very diverse influences. What are some of these influences, and how are they specifically heard in his music? What are his "sacred" and "maninya" styles? Read this interview and the bio and summary underneath for info that might help you.


3. Listen to some other of Edwards' works

to help place "Mountain Chant" into context. Listen to them, and then to "Mountain Chant": what are the similarities and differences?

4. Edwards mentions Messiaen's use of birdsong in the interview above. Study the first movement of Quartet for the End of Time.

(i) Describe each instrument's melodic and rhythmic material.
Violin: Two ideas: the first consists of three notes on a high Eb followed by eight fast repeated notes on the A above (tritone interval); Second idea is a quick three note call - an arpeggiated diminished triad - C#-G-E. These ideas are continually repeated at varying intervals - using rhythmic displacement.
Clarinet: Consists of a main idea which is complex and unpredictable, but prominently features diminished octaves, tritones, semitones, minor sixths and other dissonant leaps, imitating birdsong. The rhythm and melodic ideas are freely transformed, extended, retrograded, embellished etc - a wider ranging part than
Cello: 5 pitches are rotated (the "color" in medieval theory) - C, E, D, F#, Bb - all from the whole tone scale; played with artificial harmonics and harmonic glissandos to create an otherworldly birdsong inspired timbre; the rhythms create a palindrome with the first 18 notes, and ALSO are based around a cycle of 17 durations - the medieval technique of isorhythm (talea) - also linked to Indian tala (rhythmic cycles).
Piano: 29 dissonant chords (clusters and more widely spaced chords) played in a repeating cycle of 17 note durations. Symbolising the end of time.
(ii) How are the layers combined?  Designed never to connect or synchronise at all (end of time).
(iii) Summarise from this analysis http://books.google.com.au/books?id=JANUr3mG3kAC&pg=PA237&lpg=PA238&ots=fKtTELbPaa&focus=viewport&dq=liturgie+de+cristal+taruskin&output=html_text
some of the techniques Messiaen has used here.
Independently operating pitch and rhythm cycles (isorhythm, color, talea), Indian talas, retrograde, "non-retrogradable" (symmetrical) rhythms
(iii) Compare and contrast Messiaen and Edwards' use of rhythm, structure and melody.


5. Composition activity: write a piece inspired by the nature and places around you. Go somewhere quiet and notice the sounds around you. Record and notate the interesting sounds. Use the pitches, "structures", "textures" and rhythms as the basis for a short (45s-1min) piece for your choice of combination of instruments and/or voices (anything except piano). (It could set a poem, or placenames, or could be wordless). Write a reflection and evaluation for inclusion in your portfolio.

6. Listen to "Mountain Chant" and follow the score.
(i) List every placename used in the text and write down the melody/rhythm. Describe each melodic idea and discuss how it is developed and harmonised within the work. How do the rhythms of the text influence their musical setting?






Text

Description of rhythm & pitch

Development techniques

Warrum





 Basses – F semiquaver- E dotted quaver tied to minim (“m”) repeated on the beat

E Phrygian established (b2)

Length of final “m” changes each time

Adds extra “bu” (extra quaver)

Motif is altered in pitch (inverted & transposed) D-E instead of F-E

bungle

T – Sing “warrum” in unison with basses then split off to go up a fifth in crotchets



Final B changed in length each time (rhythmic alteration)

Crooked mountains



SAA- “Crooked” moves in contrary motion between A2 & S while A1 stays static; dissonance on “croo” resolves to third on “ked” – same with mountains – “mountains” – S & A1 in parallel 3rds while A2 begins in dissonant parallel 2nds with A1 then joins it on G to create an E minor triad with the underlying drone. First time it is qqqqc with accent on “moun”

Truncation (eg alters final crotchet to quaver) creating change of time signature

Fragmentation (“mountains” repeated by itself the third time)

Number of repetitions changes, gaps inserted between repetitions (increases intensity of climax)

Woorut




FG-CD – two fifths on top of each other resolving to unison B (diatonic dissonance)

 

Extra “woora” added – octave E in tenor (1st and third times)

Clap two beats before “woorut” first three times – fourth time a quaver before

Last time harmonies removed, TB sing “Woorut” S melody down 2 octaves

Repeated each time with different length rests between

Whitegum



      SSAA – in ¾ dc q tied c qqc

      “white” and “gum” same length, whether dotted crotchet or crotchet

*      Bar 57 the first White is a C major chord in A and SS to an open fifth C and G

*      White-gum – first time parallel 5ths then it is in parallel thirds between S1 on F#-E and S2 on D-C and A in octave unison with S1 (somewhat because it is split between the parts)

 

*      Due to different time signatures the next White-Gum is cc qq c in SSA and A2 is cc cc. (diminution)

*      The Bass fragments the White gum White gum with just the first cc white gum on a G. (octave displacement)

*      Octave leap except S2 with a sixth still in the C major triad (moving to open fifth)

*      S1 and A1 are in contrary motion on the second white gum and S2 (the lower line) is parallel to S1. Bar 68-69 the ‘gum’ is extended in the bass from a crotchet to a crotchet tied to minim tied to another minim.

*      There is also staggered entry at 68

 

 

Wambelong


*    
  SSAAT sing wambelong dq s c tied minim tied crotchet.

*     

*      Each are different intervals apart i.e. S1 D-E is a 2nd apart, S2 C-E is a third apart, A1 G-C is a fourth apart A2 C-G is a fifth apart and T plays G-C like A1 (a fourth) and also D-E like S1 (2nd) creating a C major chord.

 

 

*      The Bass sings it backwards with a semitone between D# and C and fragments it with only dq s c

*      The tenors at bar 70 shorten the full motif – truncation

o   T1 like bass, with dq s c

o   T2 dc s c tied minim

o   They’re in oblique motion


*      Fragmented version of Wambelong at bar 73 with S1 and T playing dq s c

o   S and T are playing in similar motion

 

(5 bars after fig. 6/8 Truncation)

Berrumbuckle

*     


*      In ¾ S = dc qqq A = Crotchet rest qqqq T = crotchet rest qqqq then 2/4 quaver rest qqq B = 2/4 qqqq c

*      The T in second bar starts with ‘-rum’ and meets the SAB in bar 3 with Ber, so the word has been moved around to “rumbuckleber”

 

*      The ¾ bar on page 12 system 1 the T starts instead of S

*      The S starts with “rumbuckle”

Fragmentation – cut and paste

Fan’s Horizon





S – descending chromatic melismatic quavers followed by falling m3 hoRIZON



 

TB then sing different version

P dynamic – Basses sing cqcc…. Descending fifth and octave; T repeat horizon (qcc)

Dissonance resolving to C chord

A repeats in canon transposed down a fifth

Fragmentation of “horizon” from “fan’s”

Antiphony – first TTBB then SSAA

 

Breadknife




SAA, sung ff – two crotchets – syllabically set

First a rising 6th A-F# D and A harmonies underneath (D major)

Pitches altered but still D major in TB answer (antiphony); then B sing A- F# (octave displacement); then transposed into C major

Occurs (mostly) every second bar, interspersed with “Balor” or “Ruadan”

Rhythmically unaltered, but unpredictably juxtaposed with Balor and Ruadan cells

Balor



Tenors first time – sung ff – three quavers G-F#-E in separate 3/8 bar

Harmonised when subsequently sung by women’s voices – similar descending motion, original motif sung by A2 but third quaver E changed to D (resolving to D major)

Rhythmically unaltered

Ruadan



Sung by SSAA – in separate 2/8 bar - Sq-sq-q – dissonant chord (G-C-D-F#) resolving to C major

Occasional antiphonal answer from TB in unison (G-F#-E – the S1 Ruadan) unaltered, but repetitions are unpredictably spaced – increasingly closer together towards end of this section

Tonduron Spire

Basses: three crotchets ("tonduron") followed by a minim on "spire". Static (all on low E). Return to E Phrygian.






 
This motif is fragmented ("Tonduron" repeated) and altered in pitch (at first just a semitone added - F-E, then wider ascending leaps B-C-G-E). Imitation is used (antiphonal echoes between male and female voices) and the pitch range and dynamic gradually increase throughout the section to a climax (as TB Macha Tor is introduced beneath SA). Harmonised with tense close (pandiatonic) dissonances over the E drone. Number of repetitions changes, and gaps between repetitions change (unpredictable antiphonal exchanges between SSAA and TBB). Rhythm and metre unaltered. Divisi of parts (SSSAATTBB) to create richer chordal textures here.

Macha Tor




 

Guri, Guri anawa



Original text seems to be treated as Guri, Guri, Gurianawa

First “Guri” cq D#-E; second Guri qq rising fifth A-E; “Gurianawa” 5 quavers (2+3) Guri D#-E, “anawa” three falling steps C#-B#-A#

“Guri” harmonised every time with A major chord with D# resolving up to E (#4-5), sometimes also B resolving to A too.

“Anawa” F# major chord, with B# (#4) passing note




 





Fragmentation – used extensively. “Guri, guri anawa” repeated three times - the second “guri” is omitted the second time.

Anawa then repeated (transposed into new key) on its own, fragmented (eg “nawa”) and repeated with extra “na” interpolated , and lengthened final note “wa” from quaver to crotchet, and then to 5 beats before final “wa” chord.

Antiphony between male and female voices used extensively and unpredictably in this section.

Anawa is also inverted in bass (making contrary motion with soprano), while some parts sing single notes. Complex, unpredictable changes of metre.

 



(ii) Divide the piece into sections and describe how these melodic cells are juxtaposed, repeated and combined.
 
(iii) Examine Edwards' use of harmony. What sorts of chords are heard? Discuss the spacing of these chords, and the use of vocal registers.
Tonal Plan below:

Section
Tonality
Warrumbungle
E Phrygian (EFGABCDE)
Whitegum Wambelong
C Lydian (CDEF#GABC) (one Ab inflection added)
Berrumbuckle
A Lydian (ABC#D#EF#G#A)
Fan’s Horizon (1st SA version)
Chromatic (octatonic derived?) pentachord (1 b3 3 #4 5) on C (sopranos) and F (altos)
Berrumbuckle
A Lydian
Fan’s Horizon (2nd version)
C Lydian
Warrumbungle
E Phrygian
Whitegum Wambelong
C Lydian
Breadknife Balor Ruadan
D Mixolydian/C Lydian
Fan’s Horizon (2nd version)
C Lydian
Tonduron Spire/Macha Tor
E Phrygian
Guri
A Lydian
Anawa
F# Lydian
Guri
A Lydian
Anawa
C Lydian
Guri
A Lydian
Anawa
F# Lydian
Anawa
Gb wholetone
Anawa
Gb Lydian
Anawa
Eb Major (Lydian?)

 
(iv) perform the opening "Warrum" section (at a pitch comfortable for you) slowly, then up to speed. What challenges does the performer face?
(v) Discuss Edwards' use of rhythmic groupings and rhythmic variation in the movement, giving examples.
(vi) Look at some images of the Warrumbungles (and places mentioned, eg Tonduron Spire). What are some of the musical ways Edwards has represented or evoked the landscape of the Warrumbungles?
(vii) Referring to the list of characteristics of Edwards' "sacred" and "maninya" styles, find moments in the piece that exemplify these characteristics.
(viii) How does Edwards achieve contrast in the final section "Guri Anawa"?
(ix) What are some ways an Aboriginal musical influence could be heard in this piece?
(x) Listen to all three movements and follow the score. How does the middle movement fit within the other two?
(xi) Collate a concept analysis of the piece from your observations above, with musical examples.
(xii) Write a 500-700 word extended (essay) response to the following question: "Composers both break with and maintain conventions in their work. Discuss this statement with reference to TWO specific concepts of music, with examples drawn from "Mountain Chant".